Continuous Improvement
Checklists
Checklists are good indicators of "can do–can't do" and "done–not done," but are less informative than scaled rubrics. In general, checklists are not used to indicate the relative quality of a product or performance. Checklists are used for the following:
To record observed performance.
While students work in small
groups, you might note whether or not individuals demonstrate
ability or knowledge in some predetermined categories aligned
to course content and objectives. For example, in a unit on leisure-time
activities for Novice-level learners, a simple checklist might
look like this:
Activities Checklist | ||
Yes | No | Can name five sports |
Yes | No | Can name five activities other than sports |
Yes | No | Can create simple sentences about likes & dislikes regarding activities & sports |
Yes | No | Can ask a question about what others do in their free time |
For self-assessment.
Students can use the above checklist to
evaluate their own progress. The statements would be changed to
"can do" statements of the type: "I can name five
sports in German."
To keep track of progress over time.
For example, a checklist could be used as an inventory of
skills at the beginning and end of a course. This type of checklist
might form part of a portfolio.
Receptive oral skills |
Understands simple directions. |
Understands simple sentences. |
Understands simple yes/no questions. |
Understands vocabulary appropriate to age. |
Understands meaning of different intonation patterns. |
Understands more complex directions. |
Understands rapid speech. |
Understands language in classroom situation. |
Understands language of peers. |
Adapted from Genesee, F. & Upshur, J.A. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second-language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 88.
To specify the non-negotiables.
The
non-negotiables
(D. Clementi, personal communication, October 2002) are items or aspects which
will not be included in your qualitative criteria. For example,
if a report is to be typed rather than handwritten, include this
requirement on the checklist. Handwritten submissions do not meet
your minimal requirements for a report, so the product is not
ready to be evaluated. Giving the checklist to students at the beginning of a project allows them to be aware of, and responsible for, the non-negotiables.
The example below is intended for self-assessment by students
who wrote an essay about a story they read:
Essay - Non-negotiables | ||
Yes | No | My paper is typed, double-spaced. |
Yes | No | I wrote at least 500 words. |
Yes | No | My paper has an introduction, body, and conclusion. |
Yes | No | I included examples from the story. |
Yes | No | I proofread my paper. |
To help students fulfill task requirements. Giving learners
a checklist of the steps to complete within a task can help them
turn in a better performance. The example below illustrates a
checklist that might be used with one draft of an essay in a multi-draft
approach. This checklist focused on grammatical elements serves
to: 1) allow the teacher to indicate to students where they need
to direct attention at this point in the essay-writing process,
and 2) remind students of what they are expected to verify before
turning in their second draft. It would be difficult to give meaningful
feedback about the content of the essay in a checklist, and it
is assumed that students have other opportunities to receive comments
from their teacher and/or peers.
Essay - Proofreading check - Draft 2 | ||
Length requirement | ||
Spell-checked | ||
Subject-verb agreement | ||
Noun-adjective agreement | ||
Verb conjugations |
Advantages of Checklists
- Easy to construct and use.
- Align closely with tasks.
- Effective for self and peer assessment.
- Make learners aware of task requirements, allowing them to self-monitor progress.
- Useful for sharing information with parents and other stakeholders.
Disadvantages of Checklists
- Provide limited information about how to improve performance.
- Do not indicate relative quality of performance.
(Brindley, 1989; Genesee & Upshur, 1996; Tedick, 2002; Underhill, 1987)