This CARLA webpage has been archived and is no longer being updated.
Please visit the current CARLA website at: carla.umn.edu.

Interlanguage: Activity 2


Patterns in verbal morphology

Within Persian morphology, the nominal system is relatively simple. There is no case system or gender distinction (except for a few animate Arabic loanwords which take the feminine ending –e(h)). Verbal morphology is slightly more complex but follows a rather simple pattern (Sagot & Walther, 2010).

Looking at the third person singular & plural durative verb “khordan” shows us that there are two different suffixes that can be added to the stem, one formal and one informal. But for some verbs, such as ““ræftæn” there are also formal and informal stem changes that must accord with the respective suffixes.

1) mi-khor-ad
dur(prefix)-stem(eat)-formal 3ps (suffix)

2) mi-khor-eh
dur(prefix)-stem(eat)-informal 3ps (suffix)

3) mi-khor-and
dur(prefix)-stem(eat)-formal 3pp (suffix)

4) mi-khor-an
dur(prefix)-stem(eat)-informal 3pp (suffix)

Look at some excerpts from Fereshteh’s and Pari’s transcripts in the table below.

  • Highlight all their durative utterances. What do you notice?
  • What morphological problems do they have in their language?
  • Why do you think they made these errors?

Learner

Task

Line

Sentence

Fereshteh

Question

48

hum,…,um,….aa…bæche gorbe, koja miræveh?

Question

61

……sæb kon……um, kho, dokhtær, chera dokhtær birun miræveh?

Retell

13

Bæ'd sina, um…….<laugh> birun pænjareh miræveh,

Comparison

29

aa, mænæm hæmintor fekr mikonæm, um, un næfær-e be shæhr ba atobus miræveh.

Comparison

77

bæleh, mædresæ mirævænd, amma felæn aa,

Comparison

78

(yek, do, seh whisper) , seh bæche,um, doctor,aa olum-e siasi, væ zæban-e farsi dærs mikhunæn.

Pari

Retell

6

pir zæn-o zan-e dige um hærf mizæne, mizænæn. um ba hæm hærf mizænænd

Comparison

72

Ah..         ..aa, rævanshenasi dærs khunde. Dærs mikhaneh

Comparison 76 væ bæcheh-haye an-ha tu, um, be mædrese um,mirævæn, mirævæn…….. Dorosteh?

Please type your answers to the questions in the box below.

When you have finished typing your answer, click to compare your response with the Learner Language staff response.

Learner

Task

Line

Sentence

Fereshteh

Question

48

hum,…,um,….aa…bæche gorbe, koja miræveh?

Question

61

……sab kon……um, kho, dokhtær, chera dokhtær birun miræveh?

Retell

13

Bæ?d sina, um…….<laugh> birun pænjareh miræveh,

Comparison

29

aa, mænæm hæmintor fekr mikonæm, um, un næfær-e be shæhr ba atobus miræveh.

Comparison

77

bæleh, mædresæ mirævænd, amma felæn aa,

Comparison

78

(yek, do, se:whisper) , se bæche,um, doctor,aa olum-e siasi, væ zæban-e farsi dærs mikhunæn.

Pari

Retell

6

pir zan-o zan-e dige um harf mizane, mizanan. um ba ham harf mizanand

Pari

Comparison

72

Ah..         ..aa, rævanshenasi dærs khunde. Dærs mikhaneh

Pari

Comparison

76

væ bæcheh-haye an-ha tu, um, be mædrese um,mirævæn, mirævæn…….. Doroste?

  • Highlight all their durative utterances. What do you notice?

It seems that Pari and Fereshteh do fairly well attaching formal and informal morpheme suffixes to third person singular and plural durative verbs. But what we notice here is that sometimes they are successful and other times, not. We think there is a pattern whereby formal and informal suffixes are correct more often than the formal and informal stems.

  • What morphological problems do they have in their language?

In Persian, “Ræftæn” means “to go” where “ræft” is the stem. In durative forms, the prefix “mi-“ which is a bound morpheme should be added to the stem; the stem “ræft” converts to the “ræv”. So far we have “mi-ræv” and the third person’s singular suffix should be added to it. Then, based on level of formality we can choose either a formal ending “-æd” or informal ending “-eh”. In the latter case, however, we should omit the formal “æv” from the stem “ræv” and add the “-eh” to “mi-r”à “mi-r-eh”.

Both learners are successful in changing the stem from “ræft” to “ræv” but they fail to omit the formal stem “æv” when using the informal suffix “eh”. So they produce something between formal and informal which is not acceptableà “mi-ræv-eh” instead of “mi-r-eh”. Pari makes the same mistake (line 76) for the third person plural, “mi-ræv-æn” instead of “mi-r-æn”.
Similarly, when Pari uses the verb “khandæn” in third person singular she picks the wrong (formal) stem but the correct informal suffix and produces “mi-khan-eh” instead of “mi-khun-eh”.

Surprisingly, Fereshteh produces that verb correctly in line 78. She uses the correct informal stem with the correct informal suffix and says “mi-khun-æn”.  “dærs khandæn” means “to study”, “khan” is the formal stem and “khun” is the informal stem; “-ænd” is the formal suffix and “-æn” is the informal suffix which should be added to the informal stem.

  • Why do you think they made these errors?
The more complex the task becomes (e.g. distinguishing between formal and informal forms, not only of suffixes, but also of stems), the more difficulty the learners encounter. It seems that both learners have more trouble choosing between formal/informal stems than formal/informal suffixes. The interlanguage pattern we see above is that they tend to overgeneralize and keep constant the use of formal stems while at the same time correctly selecting between formal and informal suffixes. This pattern is consistent with Clahsen’s (1981, 1984) Initialization-Finalization strategy, which permits changes to the beginnings and ends of a sequence (e.g. a verb) while blocking changes to an internal position (e.g. a verb stem).

 

CARLA Mailing List Signup Contact CARLA CARLA Events Donate to CARLA CARLA on Facebook CARLA on YouTube Twitter
Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA) • 140 University International Center • 331 - 17th Ave SE • Minneapolis, MN 55414